5/17/2023 0 Comments Red herring fallacy in commercialsBush’s address to the nation on the evening of September 11, 2001. You can see inductive reasoning used in the following speech excerpt from President George W. It would be more effective to present a series of facts and reasons and then share the conclusion or generalization that you have reached from them. In this case, one overly general claim is countered by another general claim, and both of them have some merit. An argument that fraternities should be abolished from campus because they contribute to underage drinking and do not uphold high academic standards could be countered by providing examples of fraternities that sponsor alcohol education programming for the campus and have members that have excelled academically (Walter, 1966). For example, inductive reasoning can be weak when claims are made too generally. Some arguments based on inductive reasoning will be more cogent, or convincing and relevant, than others. Instead, since conclusions are generalized based on observations or examples, conclusions are “more likely” or “less likely.” Despite the fact that this type of reasoning isn’t definitive, it can still be valid and persuasive. Inductive reasoning, unlike deductive reasoning, doesn’t result in true or false conclusions. While introductory speakers are initially attracted to inductive reasoning because it seems easy, it can be difficult to employ well. Inductive reasoning reaches conclusions through the citation of examples and is the most frequently used form of logical reasoning (Walter, 1966).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |